Warsaw, 6 May 2020 – Aid for companies within the framework of the anti-crisis shield is expected. Great care should be taken when filling out applications and later when spending the acquired funds. Mistakes by entrepreneurs may result in multi-million euro fines and even imprisonment – points out Arkadiusz Matusiak, a former prosecutor and expert in the field of fiscal-criminal liability who heads the White-Collar Crime team in the Warsaw office of Wolf Theiss.
Within the framework of the COVID-19 regulations, Polish entrepreneurs have the possibility of obtaining a subsidy to cover 3 months’ wages for their employees. Work is underway on regulations that would grant subsidies to cover interest on loans, as well as liquidity, preferential and investment financing from the Polish Development Fund (Polski Fundusz Rozwoju, PFR). The value of the program for large companies is PLN 25 billion (EUR 7.66 billion), and the assumed amount of non-returnable funds may reach PLN 12 billion (EUR 2.62 billion). However, qualifiying for the subsidies requires entrepreneurs to meet a number of conditions, such as maintaining employment figures at pre-pandemic levels.
“The simplified procedures to apply for and obtain the subsidies encourages their use. On the other hand, the limitation of time and determination to maintain liquidity or continuity of production can be quite a challenge for entities not experienced in obtaining financial aid. Mistakes made during the application process and while spending the funds may become very costly. Furthermore, each crisis means an increase in the grey market, so we can expect that the announced controls will be intensified, meaning increased scrutiny of both the information contained in applications and the spending of financial aid. We are already being approached by entities that need professional services in terms of minimizing risks for managers, especially since for many companies the anti-crisis shield may be their first experience in obtaining state aid,” says Arkadiusz Matusiak.
What is important, as Arkadiusz points out, is that the anti-crisis shield does not provide for the suspension of fiscal control in companies. The National Revenue Administration (Krajowa Administracja Skarbowa, KAS) operates normally and continues to conduct proceedings, although the course of deadlines and all court proceedings have been suspended, at least until the implementation of subsequent stages of the so-called “de-frosting of the economy”.
“Much will depend on interpretation and practice, but when irregularities are reported and a reasonable suspicion of a fiscal offense or misdemeanor is raised, the authorities of the KAS are obliged to initiate proceedings. When irregularities are reported, the investigation is therefore initiated almost automatically,” the White-Collar Crime team leader emphasizes.
Articles 297 and 286 of the Criminal Code, which provide for penalties for so-called subsidy fraud and the misuse of property, may apply to irregularities related to the acquisition and disbursement of funds under the anti-crisis shield. Courts in such cases most often impose a combination of prison sentences and fines, but what is important, they order the offender to rectify damages and return the unduly collected amounts.
“Investigations under both articles are initiated ex officio. That is why it is so important to spend the subsidies according to their purpose. It is easy to imagine that instead of wages, part of the money will be spent on other commitments, which may pose a real risk for managers who approve payments. The situation will be even more serious if during an inspection or investigation it is proven that incorrect or insufficient documentation has been drawn up or a false statement was made during the application stage, for example, in order to achieve personal financial gain. Then prison sentences and high fines may be applied, which may reach a maximum of PLN 6 million (EUR 1.3 million),” adds Arkadiusz Matusiak.
The implementation of procedures that will make it impossible to disburse funds for purposes other than those provided for in the act will be crucial.
“Managers are liable with all their assets, which may prove insufficient to satisfy claims arising from liability for prohibited acts, especially in cases where large value subsidies have been granted. According to the PFR, the maximum, partially non-refundable preferential financing for large companies may amount to PLN 750 million (EUR 164.8 million). For example, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy informed that Meble Black Red White received PLN 1.78 million (EUR 391,000) in aid to protect jobs, Decathlon – PLN 1 million (EUR 220,000) and TC Debica – PLN 5.51 million (EUR 1.2 million). This shows the scale of fiscal responsibility for managers. On the part of entrepreneurs, we should expect an increase in activities aimed at securing internal processes, also with the support of professional advisors. Not every enterprise will be able to prepare appropriate regulations or strengthen the security of payment authorization on its own. On the part of the legislator, we can expect acceleration of work on regulations concerning the liability of collective entities for acts prohibited under the threat of penalty. The latter will strengthen the bodies of KAS in actions against dishonest entrepreneurs and will allow KAS to demand payment of damages or fines from not only managers but companies as well,” summarizes Arkadiusz Matusiak.
Read the full text
Reliable spending of financial aid will protect entrepreneurs from subsidy fraud penalties
Warsaw, 6 May 2020 – Aid for companies within the framework of the anti-crisis shield is expected. Great care should be taken when filling out applications and later when spending the acquired funds. Mistakes by entrepreneurs may result in multi-million euro fines and even imprisonment – points out Arkadiusz Matusiak, a former prosecutor and expert […]...
Wolf Theiss berät AFIAA bei Verkauf ihres Immobilienportfolios an RMI Gruppe
Wien, 30. April 2020 – Die Schweizer Anlagestiftung AFIAA hat beim Verkauf ihres aus 6 Objekten bestehenden Büro- und Retail- Immobilienportfolios in Salzburg aus dem Fonds AFIAA Global an den deutschen Immobilienentwickler RMI auf die Expertise von Wolf Theiss gesetzt. Das Signing hat im März, das Closing Ende April stattgefunden. Unter der Leitung von Partner […]...
Competition council investigations – Brief practical instruction manual
The Romanian Competition Council is assessing, (at the request of the Romanian energy regulator ANRE): (i) the manner by which energy prices are established on the centralized market (OPCOM); (ii) OPCOM's activities generally in the month of January 2017; and (iii) two transactions between yet-unidentified parties in particular. The energy price for the day ahead market ("PZU") for the first week of January was between 184.7 lei / Mhw and 279.6 lei/Mhw, and thereafter rose to 509.2 lei Mhw on 28th of January, with certain suspicious transactions appearing to have been concluded at higher-than-normal prices....
The European account preservation order at a glance – 7 questions & 7 answers
The EU Regulation No 655/2014 of 15 May 2014 established a European Account Preservation Order (“EAPO”). The Regulation became applicable as of 18 January 2017 within the EU except for the United Kingdom and Denmark ....
Claims settlement order in bankruptcy proceedings declared unconstitutional
The Constitutional Court of FBiH has found that the current order of settlement of workers' claims in bankruptcy proceedings is unconstitutional....
Improving the position of secured creditors under registered pledges in Bulgaria
Almost two decades after being adopted following the model of the World Bank and UNCITRAL for non-possessory registered pledges, the Special Pledges Act (the "Act") was substantially amended at the end of 2016. Most of the amendments take immediate effect while those concerning the digitalization of the Central Register of Special Pledges (the "Register") will come into force on 1 September 2018....
The dismissal decision can be validly communicated by e-mail
The High Court of Justice of Romania established in Decision no.34/2016, published in the Official Monitor no.18 dated 9 January 2017, that a dismissal decision which an employer communicates by e-mail is validly communicated....
Waste to energy helps to secure Europe’s energy future
Advising in utilities projects that convert waste to energy is just one way that Wolf Theiss helps clients innovate and achieve added value. In advance of his guest presentation in February at the Energy from Waste (EfW) Conference 2017 at the Royal College of Physicians in London, Partner Bryan W. Jardine of Wolf Theiss Bucharest examines the current regulatory and incentive regimes that promote EfW projects in CEE/SEE and takes a look at the wide variation between the different countries....
January 2017, new rules in financial business activities
The law on financial business activities in FBiH (law) aims at protecting and improving the position of small and medium-sized enterprises acting as creditors in financial transactions....
Trade mark offensive 2017 – Amendments to the Austrian trade mark protection act
New regulations to the EU's Trade Mark Law were established with Regulation EU 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Directive EU 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council from 16.12.2015, which entered into force as of 1 October 2017. By implementing the Trade Mark Directive, the Austrian legislators have adapted the Austrian Trade Mark Protection Act (MSchG) to the European requirements within the amendment BGBl I Nr. 124/2017 from 1.8.2017 comprehensively. The amendment to the Trade Mark Protection Act has been in effect since 1 September 2017 for the most part and facilitates the application process in a number of ways....
EU court of justice rules on Intel case – Exclusivity rebates not per se unlawful
On 6 September 2017, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Intel case. The CJEU quashed the 2014 judgment of the General Court ("GC") which had upheld a fine of EUR 1.06 billion imposed on Intel by the European Commission ("Commission") in 2009. Intel had been accused of abusing its dominant position by granting exclusivity rebates to customers....
News from the Austrian parliament
Rights to withdraw from an Insurance Contract will be harmonised in Austria...