accessibilityalertarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upclosedigital-transformationdiversitydownloaddrivedropboxeventsexitexpandfacebookguideinstagramjob-pontingslanguage-selectorlanguagelinkedinlocationmailmenuminuspencilphonephotoplayplussearchsharesoundshottransactionstwitteruploadwebinarwp-searchwt-arrowyoutube

INCREASED MANDATORY FILING THRESHOLD

What changed? Under the revised thresholds, the merger of undertakings must be notified to the Hungarian Competition Authority ("NCA"), if in the previous financial year:

  • the combined net turnover of all groups of undertakings concerned exceeded HUF 15 billion (approx. EUR 48 million); and
  • among the groups of undertakings concerned there are at least two the net turnover of which exceeded HUF 1 billion (approx. EUR 3,2 million).

The result? The second prong of the twofold threshold test in Hungary was doubled and the expectation was that it would result in a 10 to 15% drop in notifications.  Indeed, the first six months of the revised filing test fulfilled these expectations, with no substantial increase in the number of merger cases in front of the NCA despite the upheaval of the M&A market in general.

THE SOFT THRESHOLD INTRODUCED

What changed? Under a completely new rule, a merger also became notifiable in Hungary, if:

  • the combined net turnover of all groups of undertakings concerned exceeded HUF 5 billion (approx. EUR 16 million) in the previous financial year; and
  • it is not clear whether the merger will significantly impede effective competition on the relevant market or not.

The result? Although the market shares held by the undertakings concerned and the structure of the relevant market(s) are primarily indicative to judge how and when this soft threshold will trigger a merger filing requirement in Hungary, the expectation was that the upcoming practice of the Hungarian NCA would further fine-tune the relevant conditions. The tsunami of merger cases under this soft threshold which could give a better indication of the NCA’s preferred approach has not arrived, yet. However, it is clear that the new soft threshold will be particularly relevant for the information and new technology sectors when leading market players are acquiring innovative start-up businesses.

UPDATES TO MERGER CONTROL PROCEEDINGS

What changed? Among the novelties on the procedural front, there are some changes to the soft threshold:

  • there is no stand-still obligation with respect to the soft threshold and hence the NCA is formally not authorized to impose fines on the merging undertakings for gun-jumping; and
  • mergers caught by the soft threshold may be brought under a merger control review only if the NCA has commenced its proceedings within six months after the implementation of the transaction.

Furthermore, all mergers in general were made subjected to dawn raids in case the NCA suspect that the undertakings concerned has:

  • breached the standstill obligation; or
  • withheld information from the NCA or provided misleading information during the merger control procedure.

The result? As a result, the NCA’s investigatory powers were brought on par with those of the European Commission.  None of these rules have been put to the test yet.

The introduction of summary review proceedings, however, which allow an 8-day clearance of filings raising no competition concerns proved to be very successful; already making up some 50% of all merger case in the first half of 2017.

Read the full text

Download PDF
22 April 2020

A review of the first six months of the revised Hungarian merger control regime

Amendments to the Hungarian Competition Act from earlier this year concerned rules relating to merger control thresholds as well as to conducting of merger control reviews....

Read more
22 April 2020

Watch out: Fee to be introduced for the registration and annual maintenance of “.ro” domains

In December 2016, the Board of Directors of the National Institute for Research and Development in Informatics ("ICI") issued a decision for the introduction, (as of July 1st 2017), of a fee for registering ".ro" domains and for the annual maintenance of such domains (the "Decision"). The Decision was in line with the general approach of the European Member States, where such fees have already been implemented....

Read more
22 April 2020

Individual exemptions and selective distribution systems – The dos and don’ts in Serbia

Serbian competition rules dealing with agreements restricting competition are largely taken from and harmonized with EU competition rules. There is, however, one difference: in Serbia, if a restrictive agreement does not benefit from the local block exemption regulation ("BER"), the parties cannot self-assess whether their agreement meets the criteria comparable to those stipulated in Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Instead, the parties must notify the agreement to the Serbian Commission for the Protection of Competition ("Commission") and request that it is individually exempted from the legal restriction....

Read more
22 April 2020

Central transportation port – Huge investment in the middle of Poland

THE PENNY HAS DROPPED It's official - the Central Transportation Port (formerly known as Central Airport) will be located between Łódź and Warsaw. It is expected to compete with Europe's largest airports. The construction decision was approved by the Economic Committee of the Council of Ministers on March 15. Currently the Ministry of Infrastructure and Construction together with the Ministry of Development are preparing a resolution regulating the financing, implementation, and operation of the Central Transportation Port (CPK)....

Read more
22 April 2020

Important changes into Romanian competition law – An overview

On 8 June 2017, Emergency Government Ordinance 39/2017 ("EGO 39") entered into force and brought a number of important changes to the Romanian Competition law. The EGO transposes the EU Damages Directive (2014/104/EU) into Romanian law and introduces a number of other changes into Romanian competition law, including inter alia: (i) a specific obligation incumbent upon modern retailers to provide, (upon request), information to the Competition Council regarding their resale prices; (ii) additional powers of the Romanian Competition Council ('RCC') during dawn raids....

Read more
22 April 2020

Reminder regarding deadline in Romania for risk analysis for physical security: July 1st, 2017

According to the Government Decision no. 301/2012 on the approval of the Methodological Norms for the application of Law no. 333/2003 regarding the safeguarding of objectives, assets, valuables and protection of individuals ("GD no. 301/2012"), certain entities that hold assets or other valuables regardless of the title are required to ensure proper security measures for those assets/valuables....

Read more
22 April 2020

The Austrian authorities have requested information on UBS account holders resident in Austria

The Austrian authorities have requested information from the Swiss Federal Tax Administration on UBS account holders resident in Austria, to check if UBS clients fulfilled their tax obligations under Austrian law. According to a notice published today, any person holding an account or who was the beneficial owner of such an account between 2006 and 2008 shall contact UBS....

Read more
22 April 2020

Companies’ European unique identifier

Following the adoption of the Law no. 152/2015 (amending and supplementing the national legislation regarding the registration procedure with the Trade Registry), which transposes the objectives of EU Directive 2012/17/UE of 13 June 2012 regarding the interconnection of central, commercial and companies registers, beginning with the date of 7 July 2017, individuals and legal entities that are registered with the Trade Registry will also have an European unique identifier ("EUID") allowing them to be unequivocally identified in communication between registers through the system of interconnection of central, commercial and companies registers as organized at the European Union level....

Read more
22 April 2020

Defendants beware: New legislation on class actions in Poland

A NEW LAW MAY UNLOCK CLASS ACTION LITIGATION IN POLAND On June 1, 2017 new provisions on class actions will come into force in Poland. The incoming law should result in a major increase locally of this type of litigation....

Read more
22 April 2020

New aid scheme for energy based on biomass, biogas, and geothermal source

THE RELEVANT NUMBERS The Romanian Government approved (effective as of 14 April of this year) a State aid scheme which is aimed at stimulating investments in an area which both government officials and market players view as insufficiently developed – the production of energy (power and/or heat) from biomass, biogas, and geothermal sources....

Read more
22 April 2020

First successful investment treaty claim over subsidy cuts to renewable energy investments

Since 2013, several investment treaty claims have been filed in the field of renewable energy against European member states based upon alleged breach of the Energy Charter Treaty....

Read more
22 April 2020

Vermeiden Sie einen Ausschluss wegen mangelnder beruflicher Zuverlässigkeit!

Auf Grund des Vorwurfs illegaler Preisabsprachen finden derzeit bei etlichen österreichischen Bauunternehmen Hausdurchsuchungen durch die Wirtschafts- und Korruptionsstaatsanwaltschaft bzw das Bundesamt zur Korruptionsprävention und Korruptionsbekämpfung sowie die Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde statt. Bereits diese Erhebungen bzw die daraus resultierenden Vorwürfe können – für sich alleine – vergaberechtliche Konsequenzen wie den Ausschluss des jeweiligen Unternehmens von laufenden Vergabeverfahren (aufgrund des Verlustes der beruflichen Zuverlässigkeit) nach sich ziehen (etwa wenn aus Sicht eines öffentlichen Auftraggebers eine "schwere berufliche Verfehlung" festgestellt wurde; einer rechtskräftigen Verurteilung bedarf es dazu nicht)....

Read more