accessibilityalertarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upclosedigital-transformationdiversitydownloaddrivedropboxeventsexitexpandfacebookguideinstagramjob-pontingslanguage-selectorlanguagelinkedinlocationmailmenuminuspencilphonephotoplayplussearchsharesoundshottransactionstwitteruploadwebinarwp-searchwt-arrowyoutube

On 19 August 2016, the new Merger Clearance Regulation (the "Regulation") entered into force. The adoption of the Regulation can be considered as another step towards harmonizing Ukrainian legislation with EU law. The Regulation significantly reduces the scope of information that must be provided to the Ukrainian competition authority (the "AMC") to obtain merger clearance.

The previous Regulation required that the parties to a contemplated merger provide the AMC with a large amount of documents and information, which were often irrelevant to the consideration of the transaction. For instance, it was mandatory to list all undertakings connected to the applicants by control relations (even if they had nothing to do with Ukraine) together with information about their subdivisions, addresses, etc. It goes without saying that gathering such data, especially when large multinational groups of companies containing hundreds of companies were involved, can be very time-consuming.

In practice, to save time, instead of submitting all required information to the AMC, the applicants often filed motions to the authority requesting to limit the scope of required information. However, it was far from certain that the AMC would accept such requests; it remained at their discretion to decide whether to satisfy such requests or reject them and return the filed applications as incomplete.

By contrast, the new Regulation removes the requirement to disclose information on all undertakings connected to parties to a merger under consideration by relations of control. Now, apart from the parties to the merger, it is required to provide information only on their beneficial owners and affiliates registered and/or active in Ukraine.

The Regulation contains a number of other positive developments, such as the simplification of filing forms, the elimination of the requirement to provide the list of minority shareholdings and the electronic database. In particular, preparation of the electronic database was quite a burdensome, time-consuming and unnecessary exercise (as all information therein was identical to that submitted to the AMC in written form).

At the same time, the Regulation is not yet ideal. For example, it requests information on beneficial owners of a target in the transaction regardless of the fact that as a result of transaction whereby a target is to be sold off, the relations of control between the beneficial owners and the target will terminate.

We expect the Regulation significantly to simplify, shorten and make the process of gathering required information by notifying parties as well as the merger filing process itself more cost-efficient.

Read the full text

Download PDF
1 February 2019

Ukrainian competition authority adopts new merger clearance regulation

The new Merger Clearance Regulation that entered into force on 19 August 2016, can be considered as another step towards harmonizing Ukrainian legislation with EU law. The Regulation, though not yet ideal, contains a number of positive developments that we expect significantly to simplify, shorten and make the process of gathering required information by notifying parties as well as the merger filing process itself more cost-efficient....

Read more
1 February 2019

Bulgaria: Reading between the lines of the banking system assessment

The Bulgarian National Bank (BNB) released the results of the banking system overview, which was initiated earlier this year. Pursuant to the report of the national regulator on the outcome of the asset quality review (AQR) and the stress tests, that was announced recently (Report), the domestic banking sector successfully passed this, first-of-its-kind, system–wide assessment. The tests in Bulgaria were extended throughout all 22 locally licensed banks, with the exception of the 6 branches of foreign banks operating in the country. As a result, the domestic exercise had a broader scope than its Eurozone counterpart, which only covered the banking institutions of systematic importance....

Read more
1 February 2019

ESMA – Advises on extension of funds passport

The European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) has published its second set of advice (the “Advice”) on the possible extension of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) passport to non-EU alternative investment funds managers (“AIFMs”) and non-EU alternative investment funds (“AIFs”)....

Read more
1 February 2019

New contract registration in the Czech Republic

As of 1 July 2016, nearly all contracts concluded with the Czech State must be published in the Register of Contracts (the "Register"). This obligation was introduced by the new Czech Contract Register Act (1) (the "Act"). This article briefly summarizes the core scope of the Act and its application....

Read more
1 February 2019

Developments in consumer credit regulation in the Czech Republic

On 27 July 2016, the President of the Czech Republic signed a new Consumer Credit Act (the "CCA") that brings substantial changes to the provision of consumer (and mortgage) credit (the "credit"). The new legislation will affect, among others, also traders, acting as credit intermediaries, who provide consumers with credit for purchasing their goods or services. Please find below a brief summary of selected essential changes introduced by the new CCA. The novelties primarily concern credit providers, credit parameters and the protection of consumers....

Read more
1 February 2019

Reduced V.A.T. rate for agricultural products and services

The Ministry of Public Finances and Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development issued order no. 1155/868/2016 establishing those agricultural products and services for which a reduced V.A.T. rate now applies ("Order 1155/868")....

Read more
1 February 2019

Restrictions on off-shore companies relaxed in Bulgaria, facilitating fund investment

On 1 July 2016 an Act amending and supplementing the Act for Economic and Financial Relations with Companies Registered in Jurisdictions with Preferential Tax Regime, their Related Parties and Beneficial Owners (the "Act") entered into force in Bulgaria....

Read more
1 February 2019

State of emergency in Turkey

On 20 July 2016, the Turkish government announced a state of emergency for the entire country in response to the failed military coup which took place on 15 July 2016. The state of emergency is scheduled for a period of three months, starting from 21 July 2016. The decision of the Turkish government on the announcement of the state of emergency has been published in the Turkish Official Gazette on 21 July 2016 and subsequently approved by the Turkish Parliament....

Read more
1 February 2019

Common fraud schemes in the CEE Region

Fraud schemes such as "Fake President Fraud", "CEO/CFO FRAUD" or "CEO Email Scam" are an increasing phenomenon in the CEE Region. Based on a rather simple but highly effective scenario perpetrators target companies and – either by telephone or e-mail – succeed in convincing the companies' officers to make money transfers to foreign bank accounts....

Read more
1 February 2019

No award is safe! and: limitation of third party capacities!

In the field of public procurement law, the European Court of Justice has recently passed two far-reaching decisions. Our Client Alert helps you understand how these decisions might affect your businesses....

Read more
1 February 2019

The new general collective agreement for FBIH – Significance for employers

If you're an employer in Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, then watch out! A new General Collective Agreement for FBiH has just come into effect changing, inter alia, how the lowest hourly rate, meal allowance and salary increases are calculated. This complements the new Labour Law and regulates issues that it did not cover or were contrary to its provisions....

Read more
1 February 2019

Kein Ausscheiden bei Insolvenz eines BIEGE-Mitgliedes

Gute Nachrichten für Bietergemeinschaften in Vergabeverfahren: Nachdem die österreichische Judikatur die Insolvenz und das daraus folgende Ausscheiden eines Mitgliedes aus einer Bietergemeinschaft äußerst kritisch beurteilt hat, könnte eine jüngst ergangene Entscheidung des EuGH den Weg dafür ebnen, dass der verbleibende Partner das Verfahren fortsetzen oder gar den Zuschlag erhalten kann. Unter welchen Umständen dies möglich ist, erfahren Sie im angehängten Client Alert....

Read more